Sergio Troncoso: “My mother is the storyteller now, the one with great stories of grit and perseverance that give me a glimpse of how I became who I am today. Just like my grandmother. Their history is our history. Our present becomes more meaningful when we have our viejitos to tell us their stories. If this presidential election is about anything, it should be about why they should always matter to us.”
Showing posts with label latinos in Texas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latinos in Texas. Show all posts
Saturday, October 17, 2020
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Texas Observer: A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son
From the Texas Observer on A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son:
"From the start, this book takes place not so much at the border of things as on their edge: the contact zones of life and death, past and present, here and there, old and young. In the characters’ minds, we find ourselves on one side of a divide, perpetually looking back or across. With Troncoso, that endeavor is often as dark as it is funny. The El Paso author’s newest collection depicts contemporary Mexican American life with a characteristic blend of sorrow and humor. It’s his most powerful work yet, and an essential addition to the Latinx canon."

I am so grateful to the Texas Observer and Daniel Peña.
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
9:59 PM
Wednesday, October 2, 2019
Journal of Alta Californa on A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son
From The Journal of Alta California on A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son:
"Chicano literature began with the Treaty of Guadalupe
Hidalgo, when a sizable Latino population was separated from its land
and heritage. Sergio Troncoso has written brilliantly of this disruption
and its pull. In his new book of stories, he is sharp in 'Rosary on the
Border,' where a New Yorker returns to the El Paso–area village of
Ysleta for his father’s funeral, and 'New Englander,' in which an
intellectual Chicano must fight a redneck"
https://altaonline.com/fiction-thats-not-for-the-faint-of-heart/

https://altaonline.com/fiction-thats-not-for-the-faint-of-heart/
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Lone Star Literary Life's Review: A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son
Lone Star Literary Life's review of A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant's Son, by Si Dunn.
"El Paso native Sergio Troncoso’s excellent new short story collection, A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant’s Son, takes the reader far, yet not far at all, from the currently troubled Texas-Mexico border...
In A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant’s Son,
Sergio Troncoso tells skillfully nuanced stories from the perspective
of a poor immigrants’ son who has found success within the world of
America’s elite universities and financial power, yet still feels adrift
and alienated and seeks deeper meanings.
Where he finds hope for the future, his and the world’s, is in the simple yet wise words of his now-departed relatives and in memories and lessons ingrained in him at the Texas-Mexico border."
https://www.lonestarliterary.com/content/lone-star-review-peculiar-kind-immigrants-son
"El Paso native Sergio Troncoso’s excellent new short story collection, A Peculiar Kind of Immigrant’s Son, takes the reader far, yet not far at all, from the currently troubled Texas-Mexico border...

Where he finds hope for the future, his and the world’s, is in the simple yet wise words of his now-departed relatives and in memories and lessons ingrained in him at the Texas-Mexico border."
https://www.lonestarliterary.com/content/lone-star-review-peculiar-kind-immigrants-son
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
8:53 PM
Friday, September 20, 2019
NBC News: Fifteen Great New Books for Hispanic Heritage Month

"These poignant short stories shed a startling light on the middle-class
experience of Chicanos in New York. An Ivy League education and job
security in a cosmopolitan city far from their youth in the U.S.-Mexico
borderlands doesn’t mean the American dream has been realized without
further conflict... Sergio Troncoso dispels the myth of assimilation as a safe haven and reminds readers that distance from a working-class upbringing doesn’t absolve a person from the responsibility to one’s community. The wounds of leaving home never truly heal."
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
1:38 PM
Sunday, December 28, 2014
My Heart Is a Drunken Compass
Domingo Martinez’s second memoir, My Heart Is a Drunken Compass (Lyons Press), is a riveting roller-coaster of emotions from a writer
struggling with his internal demons, mortality, family disasters, guilt, and
the brink of failure. He succeeds to pull up from repeated nose-dives into
oblivion, in part, through writing, a hard-won self-awareness, and friends who
value his social insights, humor, and irrepressible spirit. My Heart Is a Drunken Compass is a must-read for those who love painfully honest memoirs and
first-rate storytelling.
The
book continues where Martinez left off in his first memoir, The Boy Kings of
Texas, a visceral exploration into Mexican-American families in South Texas,
machismo, alcoholic self-destruction, and even creativity and self-reliance
amid abject poverty. Derek, the author’s younger brother, is bright, and wins a
full scholarship to the University of Texas at Austin, only to descend into
drinking binges that alienate him from the family. In one of these episodes,
Derek passes out, smashes his head, and ends up in a hospital with serious head
injuries.
The
author is plunged into an obsession with not only Derek’s mortality but his
own, with missed opportunities and the guilt that comes with self-analysis.
Martinez questions whether his actions as a brother caused Derek’s alienation
and drinking, whether the alcoholic machismo the older brothers mimicked from
their father only encouraged Derek’s own imitations of the brothers. Martinez
also criticizes his mother’s divorce from his father, yet he also sympathizes
with her. The author also escaped to Seattle to free himself of the toxic
family environment in South Texas.
After
Derek recovers from non-life threatening injuries, Martinez segues into his
erratic relationship with Steph, “the slim-hipped gentile promised to every son
of an immigrant family as per the American Dream.” Bossy and bohemian, Steph is
also running away from her family and leads the strangely passive Martinez to
camping trips he detests and other misadventures in Seattle. Often when
Martinez rethinks a decision he has made with her and wants to question or
abandon what they are doing, she displays a terrific anger. Yet the sap still
loves her: Steph proposes marriage
to Martinez, and he agrees.
That’s
the point where the relationship unravels. Steph continues her strange behavior
of promoting half-truths about her past, manipulating Martinez into more
misadventures, and finally punching him in another fit of anger. Martinez has
had enough and more or less ends the relationship, yet he still goes back to
Steph when she proposes another trip. The author meets Sarah, a level-headed
and intelligent older woman, a philosophy professor he loves for her mind even
if he is also attracted to her physically. In retrospect, Martinez recognizes
how Steph ‘cannibalized’ his soul. As the relationship with Sarah begins, Steph
is in a horrific car accident that leaves her with a traumatic brain injury.
The
ex-fiancé takes it upon himself to care for Steph, even though her Anglo
parents hate him, even though Sarah feels as if she is having an affair with
Martinez because of his devotion to the injured Steph. This is the most
puzzling aspect of the memoir: this continued and guilt-ridden devotion to
Steph as Martinez flounders with alcoholism, fights to keep Sarah, and
struggles as a failing writer. It was a godsend that Sarah came his way, and
that she is the one who tells him “to write your way out of this.” And he does
so, brilliantly. So Martinez finally realizes what he has to do, with a little
help from his friends.
In My Heart Is a Drunken Compass readers are perhaps treated to the importance of
the ethical quality of writing. That is, how writing about something happening
to you now, even horrific disasters, gives the writer a way to gather meaning
from a chaotic present, to process it, and act so that you make better choices.
Martinez earns your trust as a writer and a storyteller because of his messy
honesty that mirrors the lives of most readers: his heart is out there, in
words, and it gets battered, and he also does much of the battering himself,
but he still keeps going.
(This book review originally appeared in the El Paso Times on December 28, 2014.)
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
8:36 AM
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
The Texas Board of Ignorance
I left Texas to educate myself. At Harvard College, one of my greatest shocks was how little I knew about my heritage and Mexican history. I was born and lived in Ysleta, less than half a mile from the Zaragoza International Bridge, yet I knew nothing about where I was from. So I spent four years at Harvard College studying Latin America with visionary teachers like Peter Smith and Terry Karl; I learned Mexican history from John Womack.
I imagined one day life would be different for a young and eager high school student from Ysleta, one who was proud to be an American citizen yet who also wanted to know more about his roots. But the recent vote on textbook standards from the Texas Board of Education shows that Texas is going backward, not forward. Close-mindedness is winning. Ignorance is trumpeted. Isolation and indoctrination are the new watchwords for those afraid of a changing world.
To recap: last week, the Texas Board of Education, led by a conservative majority, voted to call into question concepts like the separation of church and state and the American Revolution as a secular revolt. The majority voted to emphasize the political contributions of Phyllis Schlafly, while minimizing Thomas Jefferson, apparently too democratic for their tastes. In fact, the United States, according to these conservative activists, should not be studied as a ‘democracy’ anymore, but as a ‘constitutionally-based republic.’ Guess who decides what’s in the Constitution? Previously this conservative majority had attacked the historical contributions of César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall.
This is what happens when people hunker down. When your state is becoming too Mexican-American and African-American, when you feel you are being left behind, when perhaps you see the day when you will not be the majority anymore, then you retrench and attempt to rewrite history. But what happened to thinking? What happened to understanding that many Latinos, including my mother, hold deeply conservative values, yet simply do not want to be mistreated or disrespected? What happened to studying the fact that the Constitution counted a slave as two-thirds of a person, while also being a unique founding document that created checks and balances between branches of government to control their powers? Why can’t we study the failures of our history as well as our triumphs, and still appreciate that we live in a great country?
One conservative board member, in an interview, said the majority’s vote was “the return of American exceptionalism.” But sadly, the conservative vote of the Texas Board of Education shows exactly the opposite. The United States was an exceptional, historically unique country because it was pluralistic, because you had freedom of speech and freedom from a state-imposed religion, because unlike hierarchical Europe you could achieve whatever you wanted to achieve regardless of class, religion, and then later, race. We have always been a work-in-progress; that's the root of our greatness.
The United States remains exceptional as long as we correct our mistakes, as long as we keep confronting our problems head on. That’s what a democracy does, at least when it functions well. The problems get aired out, confronted, and eventually fixed more or less.
But when you trumpet some weirdly nostalgic ‘America’ that never existed, without the messy conflicts, without the democratic debates, without the will of the people manifesting itself through blood and protest, what you are holding high is an ‘American absolutism.’ You are saying, in effect, stop thinking. Stop including the newcomers, like Latinos, and stop turning them into Americans. You are saying stop the potpourri of religions now in America; let’s all be Christians.
You are saying, without saying it, that we are not confident anymore. We are not pluralistic anymore. We must close shop. We must bar the doors. This scary new world is too much. Let’s teach our children to hide.
The only saving grace is that I learned about the vote of the Texas Board of Education in El Paso. At least El Paso is barely part of Texas. I don’t have to explain myself in El Paso, and I don’t have to endure suspicious stares or seemingly polite comments about my accent in Ysleta. As Texas becomes more like El Paso, maybe one of these days, before I die, I will feel at home in the rest of Texas too.

To recap: last week, the Texas Board of Education, led by a conservative majority, voted to call into question concepts like the separation of church and state and the American Revolution as a secular revolt. The majority voted to emphasize the political contributions of Phyllis Schlafly, while minimizing Thomas Jefferson, apparently too democratic for their tastes. In fact, the United States, according to these conservative activists, should not be studied as a ‘democracy’ anymore, but as a ‘constitutionally-based republic.’ Guess who decides what’s in the Constitution? Previously this conservative majority had attacked the historical contributions of César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall.
This is what happens when people hunker down. When your state is becoming too Mexican-American and African-American, when you feel you are being left behind, when perhaps you see the day when you will not be the majority anymore, then you retrench and attempt to rewrite history. But what happened to thinking? What happened to understanding that many Latinos, including my mother, hold deeply conservative values, yet simply do not want to be mistreated or disrespected? What happened to studying the fact that the Constitution counted a slave as two-thirds of a person, while also being a unique founding document that created checks and balances between branches of government to control their powers? Why can’t we study the failures of our history as well as our triumphs, and still appreciate that we live in a great country?
One conservative board member, in an interview, said the majority’s vote was “the return of American exceptionalism.” But sadly, the conservative vote of the Texas Board of Education shows exactly the opposite. The United States was an exceptional, historically unique country because it was pluralistic, because you had freedom of speech and freedom from a state-imposed religion, because unlike hierarchical Europe you could achieve whatever you wanted to achieve regardless of class, religion, and then later, race. We have always been a work-in-progress; that's the root of our greatness.
The United States remains exceptional as long as we correct our mistakes, as long as we keep confronting our problems head on. That’s what a democracy does, at least when it functions well. The problems get aired out, confronted, and eventually fixed more or less.
But when you trumpet some weirdly nostalgic ‘America’ that never existed, without the messy conflicts, without the democratic debates, without the will of the people manifesting itself through blood and protest, what you are holding high is an ‘American absolutism.’ You are saying, in effect, stop thinking. Stop including the newcomers, like Latinos, and stop turning them into Americans. You are saying stop the potpourri of religions now in America; let’s all be Christians.
You are saying, without saying it, that we are not confident anymore. We are not pluralistic anymore. We must close shop. We must bar the doors. This scary new world is too much. Let’s teach our children to hide.
The only saving grace is that I learned about the vote of the Texas Board of Education in El Paso. At least El Paso is barely part of Texas. I don’t have to explain myself in El Paso, and I don’t have to endure suspicious stares or seemingly polite comments about my accent in Ysleta. As Texas becomes more like El Paso, maybe one of these days, before I die, I will feel at home in the rest of Texas too.
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
8:17 PM
Monday, November 2, 2009
Is the Texas Library Association excluding Latino writers?
I had a wonderful time at the Texas Book Festival, which was well-organized and full of lively literary parties. On Saturday, I walked through the white tents next to the state capitol, gathering handouts from commercial publishers, lit organizations, and university presses. My panel was not until Sunday, so this was my day to play.
But as I stopped at the Texas Library Association’s (TLA) table and perused a yellow handout entitled “2009 Tayshas Annotated Reading List,” a book list compiled by public and school librarians from the Young Adult Round Table (YART), I noticed precious few Latino authors or subjects. In fact, as I counted and reread the book summaries (later confirmed by studying the books online at booksellers), only three were by or about Latinos. Three out of 68 young adult books recommended by TLA.

This fact was disturbing enough, but then I walked to the panel on the Tomás Rivera Children’s Book Awards, with Benjamin Saenz (He Forgot to Say Goodbye) and Carmen Tafolla (The Holy Tortilla and a Pot of Beans), and previous winner Francisco Jiménez. Saenz’s and Tafolla’s award-winning books are aimed at young adults. Both authors are from Texas. Both books are published in the time period covered by the TLA list, 2007-2008. And both books are excluded from the list. (Margarita Engle’s The Surrender Tree (a Newbury Honor book) and Oscar Hijuelos’s Dark Dude (Starred review from Booklist) are also not on the TLA list, and that's just a cursory look at 2008.)
As I sat listening to the panelists talk about fighting to have Mexican-American literature included in the canon of American literature, as I heard them talk about their struggles to reach young Latinos with stories that reflect their lives, I admired the careful words of Saenz, Tafolla, and Jiménez at the same time that I seethed at the TLA. What was going on here? The juxtaposition between what the TLA was peddling at their table and the Tomás Rivera panel was jarring.
My anger burst out during conversations at the Texas Book Festival, and I asked for explanations. One well-known Texas writer said it was the “morality police” mentality of certain Texas librarians, who enforced their morality more strictly with anything Latino, a sophisticated kind of ethnic discrimination. A Texas librarian said it had to do with the YART panel itself, who was on it, who recommended books, but even she was surprised the TLA list contained only three books by or about Latinos. “That’s pathetic,” she said.
Indeed, it is. Latinos comprise about half the current students enrolled in Texas K-12 schools. When we or the media decry the high Hispanic high school drop-out rates, are we also training school administrators to be bilingual? Welcoming non-English-speaking parents to become involved in the schooling of their children is essential. I know my mother did not feel, nor was she ever treated, like an alien when she went to talk to my teachers or the principal at South Loop School. Why? They spoke Spanish, even the güeritos who were not Latinos. But that was El Paso. What about Houston, east Texas, the Panhandle?
When we complain about low Hispanic high school test scores, are we also providing reading lists that inspire kids throughout their schooling, books that say the stuff of their lives is real literature? The School Library Journal said of Carmen Tafolla’s book: “This collection will be sought after by both teens and teachers looking for strong characters and an eloquent voice in Chicana literature. While regional appeal will certainly drive purchase of this book, libraries looking to diversify and modernize their story collections will also want to consider adding this worthy title.” But apparently not in Texas, if the TLA has any say-so about it.
The issue is not creating an ‘affirmative action’ literary list. That’s a great way to put down Latino literature while pretending to help it. We do have high quality literature, by any standard, by national standards, in the Latino community. We have writers who are craftsmen, who are highly educated, who are creating stories that win national awards and sell hundreds of thousands of copies.
So I am not asking to lower standards and make a new TLA list with 45.6 percent Latino writers. That’s ridiculous. But the effort has to be made to look at the new reality in writing and in Latino literature in particular, and to understand that there need not be a sacrifice anymore between diversity and quality. But to do that, we need open minds and their goodwill.
I don't want any librarians (from Texas or anywhere else) mad at me; I truly don't. El Paso public libraries changed my life and opened my mind to writing. I just want the Texas Library Association to think about what it's doing, and to consider a better way.
(Note: The TLA list did have three books about girls at “elite boarding schools,” and two books on Australian teenagers.)
But as I stopped at the Texas Library Association’s (TLA) table and perused a yellow handout entitled “2009 Tayshas Annotated Reading List,” a book list compiled by public and school librarians from the Young Adult Round Table (YART), I noticed precious few Latino authors or subjects. In fact, as I counted and reread the book summaries (later confirmed by studying the books online at booksellers), only three were by or about Latinos. Three out of 68 young adult books recommended by TLA.

This fact was disturbing enough, but then I walked to the panel on the Tomás Rivera Children’s Book Awards, with Benjamin Saenz (He Forgot to Say Goodbye) and Carmen Tafolla (The Holy Tortilla and a Pot of Beans), and previous winner Francisco Jiménez. Saenz’s and Tafolla’s award-winning books are aimed at young adults. Both authors are from Texas. Both books are published in the time period covered by the TLA list, 2007-2008. And both books are excluded from the list. (Margarita Engle’s The Surrender Tree (a Newbury Honor book) and Oscar Hijuelos’s Dark Dude (Starred review from Booklist) are also not on the TLA list, and that's just a cursory look at 2008.)
As I sat listening to the panelists talk about fighting to have Mexican-American literature included in the canon of American literature, as I heard them talk about their struggles to reach young Latinos with stories that reflect their lives, I admired the careful words of Saenz, Tafolla, and Jiménez at the same time that I seethed at the TLA. What was going on here? The juxtaposition between what the TLA was peddling at their table and the Tomás Rivera panel was jarring.
My anger burst out during conversations at the Texas Book Festival, and I asked for explanations. One well-known Texas writer said it was the “morality police” mentality of certain Texas librarians, who enforced their morality more strictly with anything Latino, a sophisticated kind of ethnic discrimination. A Texas librarian said it had to do with the YART panel itself, who was on it, who recommended books, but even she was surprised the TLA list contained only three books by or about Latinos. “That’s pathetic,” she said.
Indeed, it is. Latinos comprise about half the current students enrolled in Texas K-12 schools. When we or the media decry the high Hispanic high school drop-out rates, are we also training school administrators to be bilingual? Welcoming non-English-speaking parents to become involved in the schooling of their children is essential. I know my mother did not feel, nor was she ever treated, like an alien when she went to talk to my teachers or the principal at South Loop School. Why? They spoke Spanish, even the güeritos who were not Latinos. But that was El Paso. What about Houston, east Texas, the Panhandle?
When we complain about low Hispanic high school test scores, are we also providing reading lists that inspire kids throughout their schooling, books that say the stuff of their lives is real literature? The School Library Journal said of Carmen Tafolla’s book: “This collection will be sought after by both teens and teachers looking for strong characters and an eloquent voice in Chicana literature. While regional appeal will certainly drive purchase of this book, libraries looking to diversify and modernize their story collections will also want to consider adding this worthy title.” But apparently not in Texas, if the TLA has any say-so about it.
The issue is not creating an ‘affirmative action’ literary list. That’s a great way to put down Latino literature while pretending to help it. We do have high quality literature, by any standard, by national standards, in the Latino community. We have writers who are craftsmen, who are highly educated, who are creating stories that win national awards and sell hundreds of thousands of copies.
So I am not asking to lower standards and make a new TLA list with 45.6 percent Latino writers. That’s ridiculous. But the effort has to be made to look at the new reality in writing and in Latino literature in particular, and to understand that there need not be a sacrifice anymore between diversity and quality. But to do that, we need open minds and their goodwill.
I don't want any librarians (from Texas or anywhere else) mad at me; I truly don't. El Paso public libraries changed my life and opened my mind to writing. I just want the Texas Library Association to think about what it's doing, and to consider a better way.
(Note: The TLA list did have three books about girls at “elite boarding schools,” and two books on Australian teenagers.)
Posted by
Sergio Troncoso
at
7:03 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)